A quarterly guessing game could become a same-day, defensible call.
Built with a Head of Underwriting in mind
The kind of team this fits: a Lloyd's market specialty insurer, roughly USD 480M GWP, 40 underwriters, a submission driven portfolio spread across 12 classes.
Every quarter, forty underwriters each carry their own instincts into 1,200 submissions. The portfolio view of risk only exists once someone has manually stitched all of it back together, weeks after the decisions were already made and the inconsistencies are someone else's problem to find.
A photo or illustration of what this looks like today, before any of this runs.
Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.
Each of the 1,200 submissions gets read and classified as it lands, not queued for a quarterly batch.
Risk, pricing and referral checks run against the same case at once, instead of moving desk to desk.
A SPAR adversarial pass flags where one underwriter's call would have disagreed with another's, before either reaches a bound risk.
Every bound risk still carries a named underwriter's sign-off. What changes is what they're signing off on.
Every bound risk still needs a named underwriter's signature. The system finds the inconsistency, it doesn't decide the risk.
Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.
Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.
For a head of underwriting, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.