Skip to content
Zentis AI
Request a demo
Zentis AI
Industries
Banking & creditSOUL co-pilot, retail credit, onboarding.InsuranceFNOL, claims triage, underwriting.Finance, risk & voiceForecasting, reserving, voice agents.Insurance BrokerageEvery quote and every renewal, ready before the client starts wondering.
Products
Zentis AnalyticsForecasting, reserving, and regulatory reportingAuditOSBank, e-commerce, Shariah, and claims audit.FAMIend-to-end motor insurance automationZentis BinderDefence file assembly, live as the case runs.
Resources
NewsProduct news and conference write-ups.ArticlesLonger pieces on AI in regulated industry.Events & webinarsWhere to find us in person.UsecasesA library of reusable, editable templates.
Company
AboutWho we are and why the harness is the product.PartnersTechnology, consulting, and reseller partners.ContactTalk to the team, or book a working session.CareersJoin us
Platform
ZaraZara is where a workflow starts, Zara builds the team.Zen StudioZen Studiois where engineering opens it upZen PilotZen Pilot is where it actually runs
Request a demo

Stay Ahead with Zentis AI Insights

Subscribe to receive the latest updates straight to your inbox

Zentis AI

An enterprise-grade agentic platform for banking, insurance, and audit. Incubated by Techvantage.ai.

Platform

ZaraSPARZen StudioZen Pilot

Solutions

Audit & complianceInsuranceBanking & creditFinance, risk & voice

Trust

The defence fileSecurityAssuranceRegulatory packs

Resources

NewsArticlesEvents & webinarsClassic

Company

AboutPartnersContactCareers
© 2026 Zentis AI. All rights reserved.info@zentis.aiLondon, England
Anthropic Partner NetworkNVIDIA InceptionTechvantage.ai, Deloitte Technology Fast 50
← All use cases12 / 20
Insurance · India

Life insurance underwriting automation

A week-long file could become a same-afternoon accept, decline, or load decision.

Built with a Chief Underwriter in mindLife insurance underwriting automation — workflow screenshot

The kind of team this fits: an Indian life insurer, roughly 1,200 applications a month, medical and financial underwriting.

The morning before

1,200 applications a month, a seven day cycle, and two reviewers looking at the same medical file can land on different accept, decline, or load decisions depending on which mortality table they happened to reach for first.

Image, the morning before

A photo or illustration of what this looks like today, before any of this runs.

How this could run

Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.

  1. 01

    Medical, financial and KYC data get read together

    Mortality and moral hazard risk get assessed from the full file, not one document at a time.

  2. 02

    The recommendation comes from the tables, not memory

    Mortality tables and risk factors drive the accept, decline or load recommendation.

  3. 03

    A second pass checks for inconsistency

    SPAR adversarial checks flag underwriting calls that don't match how a similar case was handled, within IRDAI data residency requirements.

Image, inside Zen Studio

Screenshot of a Zen Studio canvas configured for a workflow like this one.

What doesn't change

The underwriter still makes the accept, decline or load call. The system's job is to make sure that call is consistent with the last one, not to make it instead.

What this could mean

Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.

7 days → 4 hoursApplication to acceptance decision
88%+Underwriting output consistency
Image, inside Zen Pilot

Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.

Where this lives in the platform

For a chief underwriter, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.

Scale this is modelled on

Modelled at 1,200 applications a month

See a workflow like this built and running, live.Request a demo
← Previous use caseAll use casesNext use case →