A ten day case could close in one, without needing a senior investigator every time.
Built with a Head of Fraud & Financial Crime in mind
The kind of team this fits: a retail bank fraud and financial crime function, roughly 180 cases a month, mix of transaction and application fraud.
180 cases a month, a ten day median to a closure recommendation, and most of them end up escalated to a senior investigator who re-reads the same evidence a junior handler already pulled together the week before.
Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.
Transaction history, account data, and external watchlists are pulled together automatically.
Behavioral patterns and fraud indicators are assessed across the case at once, not sequentially.
The case file arrives with the evidence, the analysis, and the recommendation, ready for review.
Screenshot of a Zen Studio canvas configured for a workflow like this one.
A senior investigator still reviews and signs every closure recommendation. What changes is how much of the file they have to read before they can.
Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.
Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.
For a head of fraud & financial crime, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.